{"id":2917,"date":"2026-01-28T14:56:21","date_gmt":"2026-01-28T11:56:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/?p=2917"},"modified":"2026-01-28T15:13:50","modified_gmt":"2026-01-28T12:13:50","slug":"yapi-tatil-tutanagi-ve-yikim-kararinin-mulkiyet-hakkina-mudahale-kapsaminda-degerlendirilmesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/?p=2917","title":{"rendered":"YAPI TAT\u0130L TUTANA\u011eI VE YIKIM KARARININ M\u00dcLK\u0130YET HAKKINA M\u00dcDAHALE KAPSAMINDA DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><em>Yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ve y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131, her ne kadar kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131yla tesis edilen idari i\u015flemler olsalar da; usule, yetkiye ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde uyguland\u0131klar\u0131nda, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na a\u011f\u0131r ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir m\u00fcdahaleye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015febilirler.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Yap\u0131 Tatil Tutana\u011f\u0131:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130mar Kanunu madde 32&#8217;de ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olan yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131, idare taraf\u0131ndan yetkilendirilmi\u015f teknik elemanlarca d\u00fczenlenen ve ruhsats\u0131z bir \u015fekilde veya ruhsat ve ekine ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lan yap\u0131lar\u0131n g\u00fcncel durumunun tespitini ve yap\u0131n\u0131n in\u015fas\u0131n\u0131 durduran belgedir. Bu tutanak, hukuka uygun bir y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n tesis edilebilmesi i\u00e7in ilk ve zorunlu ad\u0131m\u0131 olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An\u0131lan Kanun\u2019un 32. maddesine g\u00f6re, yap\u0131daki ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheye yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde somut tan\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi yerdeki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmler, yap\u0131n\u0131n krokisi ve a\u00e7\u0131k adresi, fen eleman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tespit edilip tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmelidir. Tutanak d\u00fczenlendikten sonra ise yap\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesi gerekecektir. Tutana\u011f\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesi ile birlikte, malike yap\u0131y\u0131 ruhsata uygun hale getirmesi i\u00e7in bir ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi ve bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmazsa mevzuatta \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 da bildirilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201c3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 32. maddesi ile dosyadaki bilgi ve belgeler birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, daval\u0131 idarenin elemanlar\u0131nca, teknik personelin de imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu 17\/07\/2013 tarihli tutanak ile ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131y\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koyacak bir tespitin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu yap\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik, yap\u0131n\u0131n ebatlar\u0131 ve niteli\u011fi, bulundu\u011fu alan\u0131n \u00f6zellikleri, konumu ve benzeri somut ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 tespitlerde bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tutana\u011f\u0131n 32. madde uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczenlendi\u011fine dair bir ibareye de yer verilmedi\u011fi, tutanakta in\u015fai faaliyetin durduruldu\u011funa ve bir n\u00fcshas\u0131n\u0131n muhtara b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kay\u0131tlar\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 fakat, tutana\u011f\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131nda &#8216;in\u015faat\u0131n yap\u0131m\u0131na devam edilmesi halinde 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanununun ilgili maddeleri uyar\u0131nca in\u015faat\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlenerek yasal i\u015flemlerin ba\u015flat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131&#8217; ikrar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; dava konusu i\u015fleme dayanak olu\u015fturan tutana\u011f\u0131n, 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen &#8220;yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131&#8221; niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d <\/em><strong>(Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6.Daire, 29.03.2022, E: 29.03.2022, E:2021\/2423, K:2022\/3789)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130mar Kanunu\u2019nun 32\/3. maddesinde yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011fi ile ilgili \u00f6zel bir tebligat rejimi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Kanun\u2019a g\u00f6re, tutulan yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclen yerine as\u0131l\u0131r ve bir sureti de muhtara b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131r. B\u00f6ylelikle tutanak, malike tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Bu durum sonucunda, malikin haberi dahi olmadan yap\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131labilmesi durumu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Zira, y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n tesis edildi\u011fi a\u015famada malike savunma ve ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmamas\u0131, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 ihlaline yol a\u00e7abilecek niteliktedir. Bu y\u00f6nde;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201c&#8230;Ne var ki hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen y\u0131k\u0131m i\u015fleminin iptali veya y\u0131k\u0131m i\u015fleminden kaynaklanan zararlar\u0131n tazmini amac\u0131yla yarg\u0131 yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvuru imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin anayasal y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin bir gere\u011fidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131sal denetimden ge\u00e7irecek mekanizmalar\u0131 i\u015fletme f\u0131rsat\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n ilgilisine usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>&nbsp;Somut olayda tebligat i\u015flemi, ba\u015fvurucunun y\u0131k\u0131lan adresinde yap\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak ba\u015fvurucunun adresinde bulunmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine ihbarnamenin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve tebli\u011f evrak\u0131 Ambarl\u0131 Mahallesi Muhtarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131lmak suretiyle tebligat i\u015flemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. (&#8230;) Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda Almanya&#8217;da ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunun kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n bilgisinde bulundu\u011fu iddialar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmadan, y\u0131k\u0131lan evde yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n ge\u00e7erli kabul edilmesi ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ilgili iddialar\u0131 mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma imk\u00e2n\u0131ndan mahrum kalmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f, can g\u00fcvenli\u011finin korunmas\u0131ndaki kamusal yarar ile ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131ndaki bireysel yarar aras\u0131ndaki dengeyi ba\u015fvurucu aleyhine bozmu\u015ftur. Bu durum ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleyi orant\u0131s\u0131z k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.\u201d <\/em><strong>(AYM, 23.11.2022, 2019\/32003 B.N.)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2. Y\u0131k\u0131m Karar\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131, y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131na konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n <em>\u201cyap\u0131\u201d<\/em> niteli\u011finde olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bunun yan\u0131nda, hukuka uygun bir y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, haz\u0131rl\u0131k a\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131n eksiksiz ve usule uygun \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu a\u015famalar, (1) usule uygun yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesi, (2) yap\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesi ve (3) malike ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre verilmesinden te\u015fekk\u00fcl etmektedir. Bunlardan birinin dahi eksik ya da usuls\u00fcz olmas\u0131, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k do\u011furur ve ilerleyen s\u00fcre\u00e7te a\u00e7\u0131lacak bir idari davada y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesine daynak olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yine, y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygun olabilmesi i\u00e7in, yetkili idari merci taraf\u0131ndan tesis edilmesi zorunludur. 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130mar Kanunu uyar\u0131nca, belediye s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 ve m\u00fccavir alanlar i\u00e7erisinde bulunan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 alma yetkisi Belediye Enc\u00fcmenine, bu s\u0131n\u0131rlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan alanlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise \u0130l Enc\u00fcmenine aittir. Yetkisiz idari organ taraf\u0131ndan tesis edilen y\u0131k\u0131m kararlar\u0131, yetki unsuru y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olurlar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131, idareye do\u011frudan yap\u0131y\u0131 y\u0131kma yetkisi vermez; y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131, ancak s\u00fcrecin tamamlanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesi g\u00f6zetilerek tesis edilebilir. Y\u0131k\u0131m i\u015flemi idarenin kolluk faaliyeti oldu\u011fundan, ancak kanundaki sebepler do\u011frultusunda ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesi uyar\u0131nca yerine getirilir (Anayasa m. 13). Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131; yetki, konu, ama\u00e7 ve \u015fekil y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka uygun olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Aksi halde, fiili yol meydana gelir \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc y\u0131k\u0131m, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelen en a\u011f\u0131r m\u00fcdahalelerdendir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> <strong>M\u00fclkiyet Hakk\u0131 Kapsam\u0131nda De\u011ferlendirme ve \u0130ptal Davas\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde kendisine yer bulmu\u015ftur. Bu hak, kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131yla ve sadece kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131labilir. \u0130darenin alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n konusu da ki\u015filerin m\u00fclkiyet haklar\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131, usule ve hukuka uygun \u015fekilde al\u0131nmal\u0131 ve icra edilmelidir. Aksi halde, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali s\u00f6z konusu olur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6rne\u011fin, yap\u0131, ruhsats\u0131z yap\u0131l\u0131rsa veya ruhsat ve ekine uygun yap\u0131lmazsa yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131dan bahsedilir. Bu durumda y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n icras\u0131 suretiyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale, yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, hukuka ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na uygun bir m\u00fcdahalenin oldu\u011funu kabul etmek gerekir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201cYap\u0131n\u0131n, tasdikli projesine uygun yap\u0131lmayan b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 (ka\u00e7ak) olduklar\u0131ndan bu gibi yerlerde yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 sonucunu meydana getirir \u015fekilde m\u00fclkiyet iddias\u0131 dinlenemez\u201d. <\/em><strong>(Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. D., 12.04.2006, E. 2004\/1650, K. 2006\/1921)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hatal\u0131 tutulan yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ve beraberinde gelen y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 bir iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir. \u0130ptal davas\u0131 idarenin tek tarafl\u0131 i\u015flemini ortadan kald\u0131rarak hukuki d\u00fczenin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar ve kesin ve icrai nitelikteki i\u015flemlere kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Kesin ve y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclebilir i\u015flem, kamu g\u00fcc\u00fcne sahip idare taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ve ki\u015filer \u00fczerinde yeni bir i\u015fleme gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furan i\u015flemdir. \u0130darenin y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 i\u015flemi de, kesin ve icrai niteliklidir<em>.<\/em><strong>(Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Daire, 12.06.2019, E:2019\/5131, K:2019\/5552)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kesin ve y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclebilir oldu\u011fu tespit edilen idari i\u015flemin &nbsp;yetki, \u015fekil, sebep, konu ve ama\u00e7 y\u00f6nlerinden hukuka uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkatli \u015fekilde irdelenmelidir. Zira, idari i\u015flemin bunlardan biri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dahi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131, i\u015flemin iptali i\u00e7in yeterli olur. Yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ve y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n da bahsedilen bu yeterlilikleri haiz olmas\u0131 gerekir. Usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bir yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 iptal sebebi do\u011furur ve bu tutana\u011fa dayan\u0131larak tesis edilen t\u00fcm i\u015flemleri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 hale getirir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u2026y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bah\u00e7e duvar\u0131 kroki \u00fczerinde \u00e7izim ile belirtilmi\u015f ise de, in\u015fai faaliyetin metraj\u0131na ve in\u015faat ile ilgili a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut tespitlere yer verilmedi\u011fi gibi tutana\u011f\u0131n 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 32. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczenlendi\u011fine dair bir ibarenin de yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131ya y\u0131k\u0131m\u0131 yapmas\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00fcre verilmedi\u011fi, bu durumda a\u00e7\u0131k ve teredd\u00fcte yer b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n saptanmas\u0131na elveri\u015fli olmayan, dava konusu i\u015fleme dayanak tutana\u011f\u0131n 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 32. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcnde belirtilen &#8220;Yap\u0131 Tatil Tutana\u011f\u0131&#8221;n\u0131n ihtiva etmesi gereken unsurlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda; 3194 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunda belirtilen usule uygun d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f somut, ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli tespitler i\u00e7eren bir yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmeden y\u0131k\u0131m ve para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u015flem tesis edilemeyece\u011finden, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen usule uygun d\u00fczenlenmeyen tutana\u011fa dayal\u0131 olarak tesis edilen dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k, i\u015flemin iptali yolundaki \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda ise sonucu itibar\u0131yla isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/em><strong> (Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Daire, 07.10.2020, E: 2019\/6602, K: 2020\/8969)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r ki, imar hukukunda yerini bulan kabili tecviz \u015feklinde adland\u0131r\u0131lan hata t\u00fcr\u00fc, yap\u0131n\u0131n ruhsata veya eklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan ancak imar plan\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131, yap\u0131la\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131, kom\u015fu parsellerin haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve yap\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131c\u0131 sistemini etkilemeyen, teknik olarak tolere edilebilir nitelikteki k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc sapmalar\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder. Bu t\u00fcr ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup&nbsp; idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmez. Her ne kadar mevzuatta kabili tecviz hata i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131k bir oran belirlenmemi\u015fse de, uygulamada ve yarg\u0131 i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda binde be\u015f (%0,5) oran\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu kapsamda, yaln\u0131zca teknik zorunluluklardan kaynaklanan ve yap\u0131n\u0131n hukuki stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyen sapmalar\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131m yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na konu edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130n\u015faat ruhsat\u0131na uygun olarak tamamlanan ve yap\u0131 kullanma izni verilen yap\u0131da sonradan ruhsata ve ekine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak zemin kat\u0131nda veya bina cephesinde yap\u0131lan tadilatlar nedeniyle y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 verilemez, zira kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak meydana gelir. Bu durumda tadilatlar\u0131n eski hale getirilmesi karar\u0131 verilmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201c\u0130n\u015faat ruhsat\u0131na uygun olarak tamamlanan ve yap\u0131 kullanma izni verilen binan\u0131n sonradan zemin kat\u0131nda ve bina cephesinde yap\u0131lan tadilatlar nedeniyle in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131n\u0131n ve yap\u0131 kullanma izninin iptali m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir; ancak an\u0131lan tadilatlar\u0131n eski haline getirilmesine karar verilebilir.\u201d<\/em><strong> <\/strong><strong>(Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi, 12.04.2005, E. 2004\/8321, K. 2005\/2135)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak do\u011fan bir di\u011fer farkl\u0131 durum ise, verilen yap\u0131 izni uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan yap\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131m a\u015famas\u0131ndaysa da yap\u0131 bittikten sonra imar plan\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fmesi ya da imar plan\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131 izni verildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 durumudur. Bu ihtimalde de y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 verilemez, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc malik sahip oldu\u011fu yap\u0131 izni do\u011frultusunda yap\u0131n\u0131n in\u015fas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201cOlayda ise imar plan\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin iptaline ili\u015fkin \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 10.11.1998 tarihinde verilmesine ve davac\u0131ya 25.12.1998 tarihinde yap\u0131 kullanma izni d\u00fczenlemesine kar\u015f\u0131n daval\u0131 idarece yap\u0131 bittikten sonra 1.11.2000 g\u00fcnl\u00fc i\u015flemle in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131n\u0131n iptal edildi\u011fi ve yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 25.1.2001 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenerek yap\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funun kabul\u00fc zorunludur. Bu durumda, s\u00f6z konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu alanda kat art\u0131\u015f\u0131 getiren imar plan\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin 10.11.1998 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, mahkeme karar\u0131 ile iptal edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle yap\u0131 bittikten sonra in\u015faat ruhsat\u0131 iptal edilerek yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ile in\u015faat\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemlerde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davan\u0131n reddi yolundaki \u0130dare Mahkemesinin \u0131srar karar\u0131nda hukuki isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/em><strong>(Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu, 23.10.2008, E: 2005\/1721, K: 2008\/1837)<\/strong><em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201c\u2026ilgilinin hatas\u0131, hilesi veya kendisine isnat edilebilecek bir kusurunun bulunmamas\u0131 halinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki imar plan\u0131 ile ruhsat\u0131na uygun olarak yap\u0131lan in\u015faat\u0131n kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak kapsam\u0131na girdi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi hususu Dairemizin istikrar kazanm\u0131\u015f i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131ndand\u0131r.\u201d <\/em><strong>(Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Daire, 23.12.2014, E:2014\/6095, K:2014\/9235)<\/strong><em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak, yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ve y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131, kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f idari yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar olmakla birlikte, bu yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n usule, yetkiye ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine uygun \u015fekilde tesis edilmesi zorunludur. Aksi h\u00e2lde, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenen yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131na dayan\u0131larak al\u0131nan y\u0131k\u0131m kararlar\u0131, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir m\u00fcdahale niteli\u011finde olur. Bu itibarla, idarenin, y\u0131k\u0131m yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na ba\u015fvururken istisnai ve son \u00e7are niteli\u011fini g\u00f6zetmesi; yarg\u0131sal denetimin ise m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 koruyucu bir i\u015flev \u00fcstlenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Stj. Av. Sena Nur Bay\u0131rdar<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131 ve y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131, her ne kadar kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131yla tesis edilen idari i\u015flemler olsalar da; usule, yetkiye ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde uyguland\u0131klar\u0131nda, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na a\u011f\u0131r ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir m\u00fcdahaleye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015febilirler. \u0130mar Kanunu madde 32&#8217;de ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olan yap\u0131 tatil tutana\u011f\u0131, idare taraf\u0131ndan yetkilendirilmi\u015f teknik elemanlarca d\u00fczenlenen ve ruhsats\u0131z bir &hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"> <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/?p=2917\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">YAPI TAT\u0130L TUTANA\u011eI VE YIKIM KARARININ M\u00dcLK\u0130YET HAKKINA M\u00dcDAHALE KAPSAMINDA DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130<\/span> Devam\u0131 &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[155],"tags":[153,151,147,145],"class_list":["post-2917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-idare-hukuku","tag-degerlendirme","tag-mulkiyet-hakki","tag-tutanagi","tag-yapi-tatil"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2917"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2917\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2922,"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2917\/revisions\/2922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/erkanpartners.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}